breaking logic 1.

this is start of a very long (i hope) logic decoding/breaking/analysis posts.

first up:

Do we live for someone who died for us, when we should've died in the first place?

Notice we should've died suggests that we have to die, but yet someone sabotaged our duty to do so. So is someone here doing justice? And why do we have to live for someone who messed up our fate and all the great plans, supposing toward the better (if not the best)?

While this sentences itself disguises itself as a rhetorical question, it actually contains some backstabbing (pessimistic view) / intrigueing (optimistic view) ideas.

This has nothing to do with the saviour thing.

Note: There is no error with the distinct word. (grins.. if you can read my mind)

Be prepared for the next series! Such posts are good for mind exercising and it keep brains working fine!