imperfection

In relationship, we always go hope for 总有一天.
what if what day never comes?

Why do people take things for granted,
and regret it only after they lost them?

Depressed..


---------------------------------


I think im a person who is able to detect problems,
but sadly i dont have good problem solving skills yet.

Don't know is it army or other things that make me feel so stupid now.
My mind feel so stiff now.

The only thing that is permanent is change.
Success belongs to the people who know how to change and adapt.
I know that but i dun want to.. I dont want to think so much..
I'm tired.
I want to settle down. The time to freeze. To capture a moment of peace.

I came up with one quote: You move the world by moving yourself. If you stop moving, you will move with the world. (Think newton's 3rd law of motion.)

the world in itself

what do you think of when you see this?
i suddenly thought of the contradictions of this society and this world on my way back home.

what can you see here?
what i see is that the long piece of concrete is being laid on top of the grass.

what's interesting?
why do they have to kill the grass, in order to let us humans walk on a clean path?
but then again, if there wasn't this path, people would have walked all over the place, and more grass would have being affected.

this brings to what im thinking: So is sacrificing some of the people in order to achieve better success/results/survival rate justifiable? An example is as some may say, "we are on the same boat". Let's say if the boat is sinking cos there are too many people. Is sacrificing people by throwing them into the sea so that the rest can survive logical? To bring a greater extent, is sacrificing "less worthy" people on the boat justifiable?

People talk about commadarie. They rave about teamwork. What is teamwork? Working together so that ALL will succeed? Or work in such a way to let the TEAM succeed while sacrificing some people? More than common, the latter will have a greater extent of success. Unfortunately, businesses want the 2nd teamwork, while in a idealistic all-for-one, one-for-all society which leaves no man behind, the 1st teamwork is valued.

So who is right? Morally? Practically? If everyone agree that what moral states is "right" then why is there a reality different from what is expected of? (Contradiction no. 1: People do wrong things even though they know its wrong)

That brings to the term selfishness. What is selfish? Is everyone working on their own presentation with extra effort so that the best can be chosen to represent the team on a presentation called selfish(The truly talented and hardworking get their deserved recognition)? Or is everyone working together to create a single presentation called selfish(Different level of contribution by each individual, and rewards are shared)

Meritocracy, is it selfishness? Or is it an evil "for a greater good"?

(Contradiction no.2: What is ideal is not ideal.)
note: can be read as what is right is not right/what is wrong is not wrong


Thus, the problem lies in the definition of ideal/non ideal, right/wrong.

My proposition: In the world there is no "Best". Because that would mean infinity. (If you get what i mean). The better you are at something, the weaker you are at another thing. So if you are super good at something, that attribute is infinity, but the opposite complement attribute is zero(or near). So actually, the best is moderation. There we have no weakness. And thats what we're tend to, in statistics sense. Think of ying and yang must balance in ur body :)


Super random but disturbing thoughts. (I didnt think this too deep, so if there is something u wan to contribute or correct, just drop a message!)